x

You’ve reached your limit of free articles for this month.
Get unlimited access to The National Herald,
starting as low as $7.99/month for digital subscription & $5.99/month for a delivery by mail subscription

Editorial

Elon Musk and the Driving Force of Society

Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, with a fortune of $250 billion, according to Forbes magazine, bought Twitter for $44 billion.

Should we be concerned about this issue? I think so, as these social media outlets -Twitter, Facebook, Instagram – have a huge influence around the world, including America.

I do not dispute the right of anyone to earn as much money as they can, as long as, of course, they obtain it legally.

However, serious questions arise as to whether the interests of society are served when the control of information, either as news or as commentary, passes into the hands of a small group of people, even if they are possessed of the best of intentions.

Musk argues that his buying Twitter will help better serve the right to free speech than it has so far. That anyone who has an account on twitter.com will be able to express themselves without the risk of being terminated or ‘cancelled’.

He is obviously implying that this has not been the case so far, and indeed that is true if one considers that Twitter cut off Donald Trump’s account by explaining that through the platform the former president sowed discord and hatred in society by spreading false information. (As he did.)

This raises both the question of whether uncontrolled freedom of speech can harm the interests of a society, as well as whether one or a few people should be able to exert so much influence in society.

The first question contains an irony, as man has shed much blood over the centuries for the right to freedom of speech. On the other hand, no constitution or great political philosopher says that any right should be completely unlimited.

As for the second question – whether one or a few people should be able to exert so much influence – these people gained their fairytale wealth through revolutionary discoveries that changed the course of humanity. But are they also prepared for the role of taking society’s driver’s seat, if such a thing really needs to be done?

Both Twitter and Facebook are full of hatred, lies, misinformation, and defamation. Should these be protected in the name of freedom of speech? And if so, at what cost?

But the most important question regarding these sites is, who has the right to decide what is posted on a platform?

These are very difficult questions. And yet, a lot is at stake. That is why a more general discussion is needed on the issue – in society, but also in Congress and the various parliaments around the world.

RELATED

Top Stories

Columnists

A pregnant woman was driving in the HOV lane near Dallas.

General News

FALMOUTH, MA – The police in Falmouth have identified the victim in an accident involving a car plunging into the ocean on February 20, NBC10 Boston reported.

General News

NEW YORK – Meropi Kyriacou, the new Principal of The Cathedral School in Manhattan, was honored as The National Herald’s Educator of the Year.

Video

Warnock or Walker? Georgia Runoff to Settle Last Senate Seat

ATLANTA — Georgia voters on Tuesday are set to decide the final Senate contest in the country, choosing between Democratic Sen.

NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump’s company was convicted of tax fraud on Tuesday in a case brought by the Manhattan District Attorney, a significant repudiation of financial practices at the former president’s business.

With Cristiano Ronaldo on the bench, the superstar striker’s replacement scored a hat trick to lead Portugal over Switzerland 6-1 and into the World Cup quarterfinals on Tuesday.

Morocco became the first Arab nation and only the fourth African nation to advance to the World Cup quarterfinals, beating Spain 3-0 in a penalty shootout on Tuesday.

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration is still actively searching for ways to safeguard abortion access for millions of women, even as it bumps up against a complex web of strict new state laws enacted in the months after the Supreme Court stripped the constitutional right.

Enter your email address to subscribe

Provide your email address to subscribe. For e.g. abc@xyz.com

You may unsubscribe at any time using the link in our newsletter.