x

Editorial

Twitter ’s Decision on Trump is Problematic

Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, described Twitter's decision to suspend Trump's account as "problematic."

Twitter explained its decision by saying that with his messages, Trump promotes violence, as the latest tragic events reveal.

As is known, Trump had about 80 million followers, whom he ‘bombarded’ with usually gross lies, such as that there was massive fraud in the elections, which he said he won in a landslide, etc.

As Niccolo Machiavelli said in The Prince, "the leader will do well to tell the truth to the people because when he lies when he can tell the truth, he will sooner or later put himself in a difficult position."

He adds, however, that “a deceiver will always find someone who is willing to be deceived.”

The decision of Twitter, Facebook, etc. not to allow Trump to communicate with the people, fans and supporters or not, through the medium he prefers seemed, at the moment, both right and beneficial.

That is because they were preventing him from adding more "fuel to the fire."

But we have to think about this for the longer term.

We have to ask the question: Who decides whether Trump can use this platform to communicate with the people or not?

Today, they did the right thing to suspend Trump’s account – but who knows what other people will be cut off tomorrow and for what reason?

What kind of democracy are we talking about when someone who has not been elected by anyone, a businessman, is able to decide who is allowed and who is not permitted to communicate with the people through these huge technology companies and their platforms?

I repeat, if today they justifiably cut off access to Trump, who can ensure that tomorrow they will not cut off access to someone else, not because they should for the good of society, but, for example, because it is in their business interest?

It is indisputable that some people using social media have completely lost touch with the truth, logic, ethics. That they spew bile and project lies and misinformation every day there is absolutely no doubt.

But should this be seen as a necessary sacrifice on the altar of freedom of expression, or should they be censored?

Is it not better for these decisions to be judged by the marketplace, by the invisible hand of the market, as Adam Smith would say?

That's why Merkel is right.

RELATED

The United States stands as a stark outlier among developed nations, not for its wealth or innovation, but for a more tragic reason: it is the only developed country where mass-casualty shooting events occur with alarming regularity.

Top Stories

Columnists

A pregnant woman was driving in the HOV lane near Dallas.

General News

NEW YORK – Meropi Kyriacou, the new Principal of The Cathedral School in Manhattan, was honored as The National Herald’s Educator of the Year.

Video

LONDON (AP) — Kensington Palace says Britain's Prince William has pulled out of attending a memorial service for his godfather, the late King Constantine of Greece, because of a personal matter.

WASHINGTON (AP) — While Joe Biden and Donald Trump are marching toward their respective presidential nominations, Michigan's primary on Tuesday could reveal significant political perils for both of them.

ATHENS (AP) — Taxi drivers in the Greek capital began a 48-hour strike Tuesday, with the second day timed to coincide with a nationwide strike by public and some private sector workers that is expected to disrupt public transport, ground some flights and leave ferries tied up in port.

Enter your email address to subscribe

Provide your email address to subscribe. For e.g. [email protected]

You may unsubscribe at any time using the link in our newsletter.